Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2

[Oliver Upton]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:37:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> +static void guest_test_system_off2(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t ret;
> +
> +	/* assert that SYSTEM_OFF2 is discoverable */
> +	GUEST_ASSERT(psci_features(PSCI_1_3_FN_SYSTEM_OFF2) &
> +		     BIT(PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF));
> +	GUEST_ASSERT(psci_features(PSCI_1_3_FN64_SYSTEM_OFF2) &
> +		     BIT(PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF));
> +

Can you also assert that the guest gets INVALID_PARAMETERS if it sets
arg1 or arg2 to a reserved value?

> +	ret = psci_system_off2(PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF);
> +	GUEST_SYNC(ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void host_test_system_off2(void)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *source, *target;
> +	uint64_t psci_version = 0;
> +	struct kvm_run *run;
> +	struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +
> +	vm = setup_vm(guest_test_system_off2, &source, &target);
> +	vcpu_get_reg(target, KVM_REG_ARM_PSCI_VERSION, &psci_version);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(psci_version >= PSCI_VERSION(0, 2),
> +		    "Unexpected PSCI version %lu.%lu",
> +		    PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(psci_version),
> +		    PSCI_VERSION_MINOR(psci_version));
> +
> +	if (psci_version < PSCI_VERSION(1,3))
> +		goto skip;

I'm not following this. Is there a particular reason why we'd want to
skip for v1.2 and fail the test for anything less than that?

Just do TEST_REQUIRE(psci_version >= PSCI_VERSION(1, 3)), it makes the
requirements obvious in the case someone runs new selftests on an old
kernel.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver