Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/2] posix-clock: Check timespec64 before call clock_settime()
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Oct 02 2024 - 11:27:22 EST
On Sat, Sep 14 2024 at 18:06, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
> checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
> ptp->info->settime64().
>
> As the man mannul of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
> tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it shuld return EINVAL,
> which include Dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
> consistent with timespec64_valid(). So check it ahead using
> timespec64_valid() in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
>
> There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
> write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
> has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
> hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
> and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
> + if (!timespec64_valid(ts))
> + return -EINVAL;
This just makes sure, that the timespec is valid. But it does not ensure
that the time is in a valid range.
This should at least use timespec64_valid_strict() if not
timespec64_valid_gettod().
Thanks,
tglx