[PATCH net-next 02/12] net: pse-pd: tps23881: Correct boolean evaluation for bitmask checks

[Kory Maincent]

From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Update misleading boolean evaluation when checking bitmask values.
The existing code directly assigned the result of bitwise operations
to a boolean variable, which is not consistent with later assignments.
This has been corrected by explicitly converting the bitmask results
to boolean using the !! operator, ensuring proper code consistency

Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
index 5c4e88be46ee..1a57c55f8577 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
@@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ static int tps23881_pi_is_enabled(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, int id)
 
 	chan = priv->port[id].chan[0];
 	if (chan < 4)
-		enabled = ret & BIT(chan);
+		enabled = !!(ret & BIT(chan));
 	else
-		enabled = ret & BIT(chan + 4);
+		enabled = !!(ret & BIT(chan + 4));
 
 	if (priv->port[id].is_4p) {
 		chan = priv->port[id].chan[1];
@@ -172,11 +172,11 @@ static int tps23881_ethtool_get_status(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
 
 	chan = priv->port[id].chan[0];
 	if (chan < 4) {
-		enabled = ret & BIT(chan);
-		delivering = ret & BIT(chan + 4);
+		enabled = !!(ret & BIT(chan));
+		delivering = !!(ret & BIT(chan + 4));
 	} else {
-		enabled = ret & BIT(chan + 4);
-		delivering = ret & BIT(chan + 8);
+		enabled = !!(ret & BIT(chan + 4));
+		delivering = !!(ret & BIT(chan + 8));
 	}
 
 	if (priv->port[id].is_4p) {

-- 
2.34.1