Re: [PATCH v13 16/40] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS access and registers for guests
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Oct 02 2024 - 14:24:35 EST
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 04:55:25PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > + if (!kvm_has_gcs(kvm))
> > > + kvm->arch.fgu[HFGxTR_GROUP] |= (HFGxTR_EL2_nGCS_EL0 |
> > > + HFGxTR_EL2_nGCS_EL1);
> > Why are you still allowing the GCS instructions when GCS isn't
> > enabled?
> Scratch that, they are NOPs when GCS isn't enabled, so there shouldn't
> be any need for extra traps.
They are, though really they should UNDEF if GCS isn't there (which I
had thought was what you were referencing here). Equally we only have
traps for a subset of GCS instructions and it's not like there aren't a
whole bunch of untrappable extensions anyway so it's not clear it's
worth the effort just for that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature