On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
Yea, and looks like we are going to do with:On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:55:14AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:No particular reason, but it should be better to not truncate here. Will
+static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)Hmm, why ULL gets truncated to unsigned int here?
+{
+ return (1ULL << smmu->sid_bits);
+}
+
fix it.
static inline u64 arm_smmu_strtab_num_sids(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
Then let's be careful at those return-value holders too:
-----------------------------------------------------------
static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
u32 size;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
size = (1 << smmu->sid_bits) * sizeof(struct arm_smmu_ste);
^^^^
overflow?
[...]
cfg->linear.num_ents = 1 << smmu->sid_bits;
^^^^^^^^
This is u32
-----------------------------------------------------------
Thanks
Nicolin