[syzbot] [ocfs2?] possible deadlock in ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan

From: syzbot
Date: Wed Oct 02 2024 - 22:18:47 EST

Next message: Qingtao Cao: "[PATCH 1/1] net: phy: marvell: avoid bringing down fibre link when autoneg is bypassed"
Previous message: Boqun Feng: "Re: [PATCH v3] rust: device: change the from_raw() function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: f23aa4c0761a Merge tag 'hid-for-linus-2024090201' of git:/..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1037e580580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f8af0b3195caed62
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=78359d5fbb04318c35e9
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/98e7ebb9603f/disk-f23aa4c0.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2b99ed3c1261/vmlinux-f23aa4c0.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9c2b8860052e/bzImage-f23aa4c0.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+78359d5fbb04318c35e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00042-gf23aa4c0761a #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.1.311/8974 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805d22c2c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
ffff88805d22c2c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan+0x159/0x800 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:2726

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88805d0dbf60 (&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_dio_end_io_write fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2321 [inline]
ffff88805d0dbf60 (&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_dio_end_io+0x44a/0x1250 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2427

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
ocfs2_create_local_dquot+0x1de/0x1d70 fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c:1231
ocfs2_acquire_dquot+0x833/0xb80 fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c:878
dqget+0x770/0xeb0 fs/quota/dquot.c:976
__dquot_initialize+0x2e3/0xec0 fs/quota/dquot.c:1504
ocfs2_get_init_inode+0x158/0x1c0 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:202
ocfs2_mknod+0xcfa/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:308
ocfs2_mkdir+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:655
vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
__do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4300 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4298 [inline]
__x64_sys_mkdir+0x6c/0x80 fs/namei.c:4298
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (&dquot->dq_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
wait_on_dquot fs/quota/dquot.c:355 [inline]
dqget+0x6e6/0xeb0 fs/quota/dquot.c:971
__dquot_initialize+0x2e3/0xec0 fs/quota/dquot.c:1504
ocfs2_get_init_inode+0x158/0x1c0 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:202
ocfs2_mknod+0xcfa/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:308
ocfs2_mkdir+0x1ab/0x480 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:655
vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
__do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4300 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4298 [inline]
__x64_sys_mkdir+0x6c/0x80 fs/namei.c:4298
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
ocfs2_remove_inode fs/ocfs2/inode.c:655 [inline]
ocfs2_wipe_inode fs/ocfs2/inode.c:818 [inline]
ocfs2_delete_inode fs/ocfs2/inode.c:1079 [inline]
ocfs2_evict_inode+0x209f/0x4680 fs/ocfs2/inode.c:1216
evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723
d_delete_notify include/linux/fsnotify.h:332 [inline]
vfs_rmdir+0x3d7/0x510 fs/namei.c:4353
do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4399
__do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4575 [inline]
__se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4569 [inline]
__x64_sys_unlinkat+0xde/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4569
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan+0x159/0x800 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:2726
ocfs2_dio_end_io_write fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2329 [inline]
ocfs2_dio_end_io+0x55b/0x1250 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2427
dio_complete+0x251/0x6b0 fs/direct-io.c:281
__blockdev_direct_IO+0x3ebd/0x4890 fs/direct-io.c:1303
ocfs2_direct_IO+0x255/0x2c0 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2464
generic_file_direct_write+0x17a/0x390 mm/filemap.c:3977
__generic_file_write_iter+0x126/0x230 mm/filemap.c:4141
ocfs2_file_write_iter+0x17b1/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:2456
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1064
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1165 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1224 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x1ca/0x2d0 fs/read_write.c:1215
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#2 --> &dquot->dq_lock --> &ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key);
lock(&dquot->dq_lock);
lock(&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key);
lock(&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#2);

*** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz.1.311/8974:
#0: ffff888031bd2420 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2931 [inline]
#0: ffff888031bd2420 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_writev+0x2d1/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1062
#1: ffff88805d0dc2c0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#22){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
#1: ffff88805d0dc2c0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#22){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_file_write_iter+0x467/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:2388
#2: ffff88805d0dbf60 (&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_dio_end_io_write fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2321 [inline]
#2: ffff88805d0dbf60 (&ocfs2_quota_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{3:3}, at: ocfs2_dio_end_io+0x44a/0x1250 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2427

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8974 Comm: syz.1.311 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-syzkaller-00042-gf23aa4c0761a #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan+0x159/0x800 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:2726
ocfs2_dio_end_io_write fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2329 [inline]
ocfs2_dio_end_io+0x55b/0x1250 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2427
dio_complete+0x251/0x6b0 fs/direct-io.c:281
__blockdev_direct_IO+0x3ebd/0x4890 fs/direct-io.c:1303
ocfs2_direct_IO+0x255/0x2c0 fs/ocfs2/aops.c:2464
generic_file_direct_write+0x17a/0x390 mm/filemap.c:3977
__generic_file_write_iter+0x126/0x230 mm/filemap.c:4141
ocfs2_file_write_iter+0x17b1/0x1f50 fs/ocfs2/file.c:2456
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1064
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1165 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1224 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x1ca/0x2d0 fs/read_write.c:1215
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f56b9d7dff9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f56bac44038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f56b9f35f80 RCX: 00007f56b9d7dff9
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f56b9df0296 R08: 0000000000041001 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000001200 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f56b9f35f80 R15: 00007fff80cd2c88
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Qingtao Cao: "[PATCH 1/1] net: phy: marvell: avoid bringing down fibre link when autoneg is bypassed"
Previous message: Boqun Feng: "Re: [PATCH v3] rust: device: change the from_raw() function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]