Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] media: dt-bindings: Add OmniVision OV08X40
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Oct 03 2024 - 08:31:35 EST
On 03/10/2024 14:17, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Bryan, Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 12:54:41PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 03/10/2024 11:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2024 10:38, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>> On 03/10/2024 09:33, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>>> On 03/10/2024 09:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:58:44PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>>>>> + properties:
>>>>>>> + data-lanes:
>>>>>>> + oneOf:
>>>>>>> + - items:
>>>>>>> + - const: 1
>>>>>>> + - const: 2
>>>>>>> + - items:
>>>>>>> + - const: 1
>>>>>>> + - const: 2
>>>>>>> + - const: 3
>>>>>>> + - const: 4
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + link-frequencies: true
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not much changed here and you did not continued discussion about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah my mistake, I didn't read the bit at the bottom of your email
>>>>
>>>> I'll do this
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/thine,thp7312.yaml
>>>>
>>>> data-lanes:
>>>> description:
>>>> This property is for lane reordering between the THP7312
>>>> and the SoC. The sensor supports either two-lane, or
>>>> four-lane operation.
>>>> If this property is omitted four-lane operation is
>>>> assumed. For two-lane operation the property must be
>>>> set to <1 2>.
>>>> minItems: 2
>>>> maxItems: 4
>>>> items:
>>>> maximum: 4
>>>>
>>>> This captures what I'm after.
>>>
>>> I commented on link-frequencies.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>
>> Ah I understand you.
>>
>> You're saying the link-frequencies we have in
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/* are redundant absent hardware
>> specific link frequencies being enumerated.
>>
>> I'll either enumerate the acceptable set or drop this.
>
> link-frequencies should remain mandatory in bindings, whether there are
> hardware specific limits in bindings or not.
> <URL:https://hverkuil.home.xs4all.nl/spec/driver-api/camera-sensor.html#handling-clocks>
Yep and my comment was not under required field. Why all this discussion
is taken out of context? No wonder everyone interprets it differently.
Best regards,
Krzysztof