Re: [RFC net-next 1/1] idpf: Don't hard code napi_struct size

[Joe Damato]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:35:54PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
[...]
> napi_struct is the only generic struct whichs size is hardcoded in the
> macros (struct dim is already sizeof()ed, as well as cpumask_var_t), so
> I'm fine with the change you proposed in your first RFC -- I mean
> 
>  libeth_cacheline_set_assert(struct idpf_q_vector, 112,
> -			    424 + 2 * sizeof(struct dim),
> +			    24 + sizeof(struct napi_struct) +
> +			    2 * sizeof(struct dim),
>  			    8 + sizeof(cpumask_var_t));

So you are saying to drop the other #defines I added in the RFC and
just embed a sizeof? I just want to be clear so that I send a v2
that'll be correct.