Re: drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:76:10: error: 'const struct regmap_bus' has no member named 'read'

From: Javier Carrasco
Date: Thu Oct 03 2024 - 12:54:18 EST


On 03/10/2024 17:13, Philip Li wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:01:50AM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> On 02/10/2024 05:21, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>> head: e32cde8d2bd7d251a8f9b434143977ddf13dcec6
>>> commit: c922c634bd926d84967275efbb7275b8645aa343 iio: accel: adxl367: Constify struct regmap_bus
>>> date: 9 weeks ago
>>> config: x86_64-randconfig-001-20231120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410021111.LknEX9ne-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
>>> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410021111.LknEX9ne-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410021111.LknEX9ne-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>> In file included from include/linux/sched.h:38,
>>> from include/linux/percpu.h:12,
>>> from arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:15,
>>> from arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:10,
>>> from arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:6,
>>> from include/linux/timex.h:67,
>>> from include/linux/time32.h:13,
>>> from include/linux/time.h:60,
>>> from include/linux/stat.h:19,
>>> from include/linux/module.h:13,
>>> from drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:8:
>>> include/linux/mm_types_task.h:19:45: warning: "CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
>>> 19 | #define USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS (NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS)
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> include/linux/mm.h:2888:5: note: in expansion of macro 'USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS'
>>> 2888 | #if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> include/linux/mm_types_task.h:19:45: warning: "CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
>>> 19 | #define USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS (NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS)
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> include/linux/mm_types_task.h:20:34: note: in expansion of macro 'USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS'
>>> 20 | #define USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS (USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && \
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> include/linux/mm.h:3010:5: note: in expansion of macro 'USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS'
>>> 3010 | #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:75:21: error: variable 'adxl367_spi_regmap_bus' has initializer but incomplete type
>>> 75 | static const struct regmap_bus adxl367_spi_regmap_bus = {
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:76:10: error: 'const struct regmap_bus' has no member named 'read'
>>> 76 | .read = adxl367_read,
>>> | ^~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:76:17: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>>> 76 | .read = adxl367_read,
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:76:17: note: (near initialization for 'adxl367_spi_regmap_bus')
>>>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:77:10: error: 'const struct regmap_bus' has no member named 'write'
>>> 77 | .write = adxl367_write,
>>> | ^~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:77:18: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>>> 77 | .write = adxl367_write,
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:77:18: note: (near initialization for 'adxl367_spi_regmap_bus')
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:80:21: error: variable 'adxl367_spi_regmap_config' has initializer but incomplete type
>>> 80 | static const struct regmap_config adxl367_spi_regmap_config = {
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:81:10: error: 'const struct regmap_config' has no member named 'reg_bits'
>>> 81 | .reg_bits = 8,
>>> | ^~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:81:21: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>>> 81 | .reg_bits = 8,
>>> | ^
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:81:21: note: (near initialization for 'adxl367_spi_regmap_config')
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:82:10: error: 'const struct regmap_config' has no member named 'val_bits'
>>> 82 | .val_bits = 8,
>>> | ^~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:82:21: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>>> 82 | .val_bits = 8,
>>> | ^
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:82:21: note: (near initialization for 'adxl367_spi_regmap_config')
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c: In function 'adxl367_spi_probe':
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:132:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_regmap_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> 132 | regmap = devm_regmap_init(&spi->dev, &adxl367_spi_regmap_bus, st,
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:132:16: warning: assignment to 'struct regmap *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>>> 132 | regmap = devm_regmap_init(&spi->dev, &adxl367_spi_regmap_bus, st,
>>> | ^
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c: At top level:
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:75:32: error: storage size of 'adxl367_spi_regmap_bus' isn't known
>>> 75 | static const struct regmap_bus adxl367_spi_regmap_bus = {
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c:80:35: error: storage size of 'adxl367_spi_regmap_config' isn't known
>>> 80 | static const struct regmap_config adxl367_spi_regmap_config = {
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>>
>>> vim +76 drivers/iio/accel/adxl367_spi.c
>>>
>>> cbab791c5e2a58 Cosmin Tanislav 2022-02-14 74
>>> c922c634bd926d Javier Carrasco 2024-07-03 75 static const struct regmap_bus adxl367_spi_regmap_bus = {
>>> cbab791c5e2a58 Cosmin Tanislav 2022-02-14 @76 .read = adxl367_read,
>>> cbab791c5e2a58 Cosmin Tanislav 2022-02-14 @77 .write = adxl367_write,
>>> cbab791c5e2a58 Cosmin Tanislav 2022-02-14 78 };
>>> cbab791c5e2a58 Cosmin Tanislav 2022-02-14 79
>>>
>>> :::::: The code at line 76 was first introduced by commit
>>> :::::: cbab791c5e2a58c123d84bd9202c054e5449bc96 iio: accel: add ADXL367 driver
>>>
>>> :::::: TO: Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> :::::: CC: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>
>> Strange. I followed the "how to reproduce" guide step by step, but it
>> compiled just fine (gcc-12.3.0 instead of 12.2.0, though).
>
> Sorry about false report, kindly ignore this. The bot side will look
> into the detail to resolve the issue asap.
>

No worries. As I already mentioned, the bot has recently found cases
where the dependency was indeed missing, I am glad that it found those
even if it comes with a couple of false positives, which are easy to
verify anyway.

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco