Re: [PATCH][next] drm/nouveau: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warning

[Danilo Krummrich]

On 10/3/24 8:44 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 03/10/24 12:36, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On 9/13/24 12:23 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 9/13/24 10:09 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Friendly ping: who can take this, please? 🙂
> > >
> > > Usually, that's me. But I thought you might want to send a v2 based on Kees'
> > > comments?
> >
> > Do you plan to follow up on this? I'd prefer if we could get rid of the open-
> > coded "17". So, maybe just go with the define until we have something like
> > STACK_FLEX_COUNT()?
>
> Do you mean the following define...?>
> nv50_hdmi_enable(...)
> {
> ...
> #define data_len    17
>      DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct nvif_outp_infoframe_v0, args, data, data_len);
> ...rest of function...
> #undef data_len
> }

Yes, it's not great, but I think it's better than having the length in two
places.

> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo