Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] documentation: use nvmem-layout in examples

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Oct 04 2024 - 02:25:21 EST


On 04/10/2024 02:00, Rosen Penev wrote:
> nvmem-cells are deprecated and replaced with nvmem-layout. For these
> examples, replace. They're not relevant to the main point of the
> document anyway.

Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters


>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../mtd/partitions/qcom,smem-part.yaml | 19 +++++++++++--------
> .../bindings/net/marvell,aquantia.yaml | 13 ++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/qcom,smem-part.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/qcom,smem-part.yaml
> index 1c2b4e780ca9..8ae149534b23 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/qcom,smem-part.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/qcom,smem-part.yaml
> @@ -45,17 +45,20 @@ examples:
> compatible = "qcom,smem-part";
>
> partition-art {
> - compatible = "nvmem-cells";
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <1>;
> label = "0:art";
>
> - macaddr_art_0: macaddr@0 {
> - reg = <0x0 0x6>;
> - };
> + nvmem-layout {
> + compatible = "fixed-layout";

This does not look right - the binding still expects nvmem-cells. I
wonder how does the nvmem-cells.yaml work if the compatible is being
removed so it is not being selected.


Best regards,
Krzysztof