Re: [net-next PATCH] net: phy: Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering
From: Vladimir Oltean
Date: Fri Oct 04 2024 - 04:19:49 EST
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:51:32AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:33:17AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 01:24:00AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:12:48AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering and parsing them.
> > > > Defining LED nodes for a PHY driver that actually doesn't supports them
> > > > is wrong and should be reported.
> > >
> > > What about the case where a PHY driver gets LED support in the future?
> > > Shouldn't the current kernel driver work with future device trees which
> > > define LEDs, and just ignore that node, rather than fail to probe?
> >
> > Well this just skip leds node parse and return 0, so no fail to probe.
> > This just adds an error. Maybe I should use warn instead?
>
> Yes, a phydev_warn() would be better.
I'm thinking even KERN_WARN is too much. There's nothing actionable
about the message.