Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] i3c: master: Extend address status bit to 4 and add I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED
From: Frank Li
Date: Fri Oct 04 2024 - 11:21:12 EST
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:29:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> > + * However, some I3C targets may request specific addresses (called as "init_dyn_addr"), which is
> > + * typically specified by the DT-'s assigned-address property. Lower addresses having higher IBI
> > + * priority. If it is available, i3c_bus_get_free_addr() preferably return a free address that is
> > + * not in the list of desired addresses (called as "init_dyn_addr"). This allows the device with
> > + * the "init_dyn_addr" to switch to its "init_dyn_addr" when it hot-joins the I3C bus. Otherwise,
> > + * if the "init_dyn_addr" is already in use by another I3C device, the target device will not be
> > + * able to switch to its desired address.
> > + *
> > + * If the previous step fails, fallback returning one of the remaining unassigned address,
> > + * regardless of its state in the desired list.
> > + */
> > static int i3c_bus_get_free_addr(struct i3c_bus *bus, u8 start_addr)
> > {
> > enum i3c_addr_slot_status status;
> > u8 addr;
> >
> > + for (addr = start_addr; addr < I3C_MAX_ADDR; addr++) {
> > + status = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status_mask(bus, addr,
> > + I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_STATUS_MASK);
> > + if (status == I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE)
> > + return addr;
> > + }
> > +
> > for (addr = start_addr; addr < I3C_MAX_ADDR; addr++) {
> > status = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status(bus, addr);
>
> Maybe here we could also use the same status_mask() with the other mask,
> just to clarify the difference.
Make sense.
>
> > if (status == I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE)
> > @@ -1918,9 +1959,10 @@ static int i3c_master_bus_init(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> > goto err_rstdaa;
> > }
> >
> > - i3c_bus_set_addr_slot_status(&master->bus,
> > - i3cboardinfo->init_dyn_addr,
> > - I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I3C_DEV);
> > + i3c_bus_set_addr_slot_status_mask(&master->bus,
> > + i3cboardinfo->init_dyn_addr,
> > + I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I3C_DEV | I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED,
> > + I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_STATUS_MASK);
>
> However I'm not sure I understand the use of the
> set_addr_slot_status_mask() function. Can't we just use the normal
> function and just extend the mask in the fist place?
The major purpose of set_addr_slot_status_mask() is that reduce code
change. There are already address alloc/free by using I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE.
we don't want i3c_bus_set_addr_slot_status() touch bit
I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED since it was init at scan dts.
There are 18 place, using i3c_bus_set_addr_slot_status(), but we only need
touch I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED bit when scan dts.
Frank
>
> > /*
> > * Only try to create/attach devices that have a static
> > diff --git a/include/linux/i3c/master.h b/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> > index 2100547b2d8d2..6e5328c6c6afd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/i3c/master.h
> > @@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ enum i3c_open_drain_speed {
> > * @I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I2C_DEV: address is assigned to an I2C device
> > * @I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I3C_DEV: address is assigned to an I3C device
> > * @I3C_ADDR_SLOT_STATUS_MASK: address slot mask
> > - *
> > + * @I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED: the bitmask represents addresses that are preferred by some devices,
> > + * such as the "assigned-address" property in a device tree source.
> > * On an I3C bus, addresses are assigned dynamically, and we need to know which
> > * addresses are free to use and which ones are already assigned.
> > *
> > @@ -311,9 +312,11 @@ enum i3c_addr_slot_status {
> > I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I2C_DEV,
> > I3C_ADDR_SLOT_I3C_DEV,
> > I3C_ADDR_SLOT_STATUS_MASK = 3,
> > + I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_STATUS_MASK = 7,
> > + I3C_ADDR_SLOT_EXT_DESIRED = BIT(2),
> > };
> >
> > -#define I3C_ADDR_SLOT_STATUS_BITS 2
> > +#define I3C_ADDR_SLOT_STATUS_BITS 4
> >
> > /**
> > * struct i3c_bus - I3C bus object
> >
>
> Otherwise lgtm.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
> --
> linux-i3c mailing list
> linux-i3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c