Re: [PATCH 1/3] rust: implement `kernel::sync::Refcount`

From: Gary Guo
Date: Sat Oct 05 2024 - 09:31:24 EST


On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:40:53 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:52:22PM +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
> > This is a wrapping layer of `include/linux/refcount.h`. Currently only
> > the most basic operations (read/set/inc/dec/dec_and_test) are implemented,
> > additional methods can be implemented when they are needed.
> >
> > Currently the kernel refcount has already been used in `Arc`, however it
> > calls into FFI directly.
> >
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > rust/helpers/refcount.c | 15 ++++++
> > rust/kernel/sync.rs | 2 +
> > rust/kernel/sync/refcount.rs | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/sync/refcount.rs
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/helpers/refcount.c b/rust/helpers/refcount.c
> > index f47afc148ec3..39649443426b 100644
> > --- a/rust/helpers/refcount.c
> > +++ b/rust/helpers/refcount.c
> > @@ -8,11 +8,26 @@ refcount_t rust_helper_REFCOUNT_INIT(int n)
> > return (refcount_t)REFCOUNT_INIT(n);
> > }
> >
> > +unsigned int rust_helper_refcount_read(refcount_t *r)
> > +{
> > + return refcount_read(r);
> > +}
>
> Reading a refcount is almost always a wrong thing to do (it can change
> right after you read it), and I don't see any of the later patches in
> this series use this call, so can you just drop this?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

I originally introduced this thinking I can replace Andreas's atomic
2->0 operation with a read + set, but ended up couldn't do it.

The refcount read is still useful to determine if the current value is
1 -- in fact, `Arc::into_unique_or_drop` could use this rather than
decrementing the refcount and then incrementing it again (just doing a
refcount read would be much better codegen-wise than the current
behaviour). I'll probably make this change in the next version of the
series.

It might also be useful for debugging, so we can have a `Debug` impl
for `Refcount` which prints out the current value. But I didn't
introduce it due to no user.

Best,
Gary