Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] sched+mm: Track lazy active mm existence with hazard pointers

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:39:15AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think the real issue is that "active_mm" is an old hack from a
> bygone era when we didn't have the (much more involved) full TLB
> tracking.

I still seem to have these patches that neither Andy nor I ever managed
to find time to finish:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=x86/lazy