[PATCH V3 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates

From: Sibi Sankar
Date: Mon Oct 07 2024 - 02:08:20 EST


From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>

Ensure that the bad duplicates reported by the platform firmware
doesn't get added to the opp-tables.

Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZoQjAWse2YxwyRJv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index 2d77b5f40ca7..38893cc44423 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int iter_perf_levels_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st,
return 0;
}

-static inline void
+static inline int
process_response_opp(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,
struct scmi_opp *opp, unsigned int loop_idx,
const struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels *r)
@@ -386,12 +386,16 @@ process_response_opp(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,
le16_to_cpu(r->opp[loop_idx].transition_latency_us);

ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf, opp, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
opp->perf, dom->info.name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}

-static inline void
+static inline int
process_response_opp_v4(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,
struct scmi_opp *opp, unsigned int loop_idx,
const struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels_v4 *r)
@@ -404,10 +408,13 @@ process_response_opp_v4(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,
le16_to_cpu(r->opp[loop_idx].transition_latency_us);

ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf, opp, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
opp->perf, dom->info.name, ret);

+ return ret;
+ }
+
/* Note that PERF v4 reports always five 32-bit words */
opp->indicative_freq = le32_to_cpu(r->opp[loop_idx].indicative_freq);
if (dom->level_indexing_mode) {
@@ -415,13 +422,21 @@ process_response_opp_v4(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,

ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_idx, opp->level_index, opp,
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
dev_warn(dev,
"Failed to add opps_by_idx at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
opp->level_index, dom->info.name, ret);

+ /* Cleanup by_lvl too */
+ xa_erase(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf);
+
+ return ret;
+ }
+
hash_add(dom->opps_by_freq, &opp->hash, opp->indicative_freq);
}
+
+ return 0;
}

static int
@@ -429,16 +444,20 @@ iter_perf_levels_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
const void *response,
struct scmi_iterator_state *st, void *priv)
{
+ int ret;
struct scmi_opp *opp;
struct scmi_perf_ipriv *p = priv;

opp = &p->perf_dom->opp[st->desc_index + st->loop_idx];
if (PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(p->version) <= 0x3)
- process_response_opp(ph->dev, p->perf_dom, opp, st->loop_idx,
- response);
+ ret = process_response_opp(ph->dev, p->perf_dom, opp, st->loop_idx, response);
else
- process_response_opp_v4(ph->dev, p->perf_dom, opp, st->loop_idx,
- response);
+ ret = process_response_opp_v4(ph->dev, p->perf_dom, opp, st->loop_idx, response);
+
+ /* Skip BAD duplicates received from firmware */
+ if (ret)
+ return ret == -EBUSY ? 0 : ret;
+
p->perf_dom->opp_count++;

dev_dbg(ph->dev, "Level %d Power %d Latency %dus Ifreq %d Index %d\n",
--
2.34.1