Re: PROBLEM: WARN_ON triggers in v4l_querycap with BlackMagic atem console connected via USB

From: Hans Verkuil
Date: Mon Oct 07 2024 - 03:04:11 EST


Hi Ulrich,

What is the output of 'v4l2-ctl -D -d/dev/videoX' of the video device that causes
the WARN_ON to appear? I can't tell what driver is used.

The WARN_ON just checks if the capabilities field is a superset of the device_caps
field. If not, then that's a driver bug. If this is an out-of-tree driver, then
it has to be addressed there. Note that that WARN_ON has been there since mid-2019.

Regards,

Hans

On 06/10/2024 12:50, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I cannot really say when this problem started but I know that perhaps
> six months back (or a bit more) I used the console successfully as a
> video source device (webcam). This is a ATEM Mini Pro which has a
> large number of USB interfaces. What trips up is videodev. Various
> userlevel programs (uvcdynctrl, chromium) notice the device being
> added and use ioctl(), triggering the problem.
>
> This is with the current Fedora x86_64 kernel (6.10.12) but a) it
> happens for a while now and b) as far as I can see this is just the
> upstream code, no local changes.
>
> The call trace is:
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? v4l_querycap+0x119/0x140 [videodev]
> ? __warn.cold+0x8e/0xe8
> ? v4l_querycap+0x119/0x140 [videodev]
> ? report_bug+0xff/0x140
> ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80
> ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
> ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
> ? v4l_querycap+0x119/0x140 [videodev]
> __video_do_ioctl+0x518/0x630 [videodev]
> video_usercopy+0x1f1/0x7a0 [videodev]
>
> I traced the offending code to an 'ud2' instruction (makes sense,
> undefined) which is reached from this code in
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c (v4l_querycap):
>
> WARN_ON((cap->capabilities &
> (vfd->device_caps | V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS)) !=
> (vfd->device_caps | V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS));
>
> The asm code is:
>
> 747e: 8b 73 54 mov 0x54(%rbx),%esi
> 7481: 81 ca 00 00 00 80 or $0x80000000,%edx
> 7487: 48 b9 00 00 20 00 00 movabs $0x20000000200000,%rcx
> 748e: 00 20 00
> 7491: 48 0b 4b 54 or 0x54(%rbx),%rcx
> 7495: 21 d6 and %edx,%esi
> 7497: 39 f2 cmp %esi,%edx
> 7499: 75 6e jne 7509 <v4l_querycap+0x119>
>
> where 7509 is the address of the ud2 instruction.
>
> The register dump shows
>
> RDX: 0000000085008003 RSI: 0000000085008002
>
> which, if I'm right, means that cap->capabilities has the extra bit
>
> #define V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE 0x00000001 /* Is a video
> capture device */
>
> set.
>
> I don't know what 'ops' points to in the code. It seems to me that
> the bit is set in the
>
> ops->vidioc_querycap(file, fh, cap);
>
> call just preceding the test.
>
> Just going by the name of the capability, it seems that the bit should
> be set as this device is used as a camera as well so maybe the
> information which comes from the call the
>
> struct video_device *vfd = video_devdata(file);
>
> is incomplete? Or the test WARN_ON condition is actually incorrect?
>
>
> Any idea? I can try to run more tests if someone can tell me how to proceed.
>
> Thanks.