Re: [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Mon Oct 07 2024 - 04:07:30 EST


On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 07:51:30PM +0000, tyrone-wu wrote:
> Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
> kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
> kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
> behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
> fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).
>
> This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABVU1kXwQXhqQGe0RTrr7eegtM6SVW_KayZBy16-yb0Snztmtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event")
> Signed-off-by: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V4 -> V5:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CALOAHbC5xm7Cbfhau3z5X2PqUhiHECNWAPtJCWiOVqTKmdZp-Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> - Check that buf is not NULL before retrieving/using its length
>
> V3 -> V4:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv_PP6Gs5cq3W2Ey@krava/
> - Split patch into separate kernel and selftest change
>
> V2 -> V3:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv7sISV0yEyGlEM3@krava/
> - Use clearer variable name for user set/inputted name len (name_len -> input_len)
> - Change (name_len -> input_len) type from size_t to u32 since it's only received and used as u32
>
> V1 -> V2:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv0wl-S13WJnIkb_@krava/
> - Use user set *ulen in bpf_copy_to_user before overwriting *ulen
>
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index a8f1808a1ca5..3df192a6bdcc 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -3565,32 +3565,35 @@ static void bpf_perf_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
> }
>
> static int bpf_perf_link_fill_common(const struct perf_event *event,
> - char __user *uname, u32 ulen,
> + char __user *uname, u32 *ulen,
> u64 *probe_offset, u64 *probe_addr,
> u32 *fd_type, unsigned long *missed)
> {
> const char *buf;
> - u32 prog_id;
> + u32 prog_id, input_len;
> size_t len;
> int err;
>
> - if (!ulen ^ !uname)
> + if (!(*ulen) ^ !uname)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> err = bpf_get_perf_event_info(event, &prog_id, fd_type, &buf,
> probe_offset, probe_addr, missed);
> if (err)
> return err;
> - if (!uname)
> - return 0;
> +
> if (buf) {
> + input_len = *ulen;
> len = strlen(buf);
> - err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, ulen, len);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - } else {
> - char zero = '\0';
> + *ulen = len + 1;
>
> + if (uname) {
> + err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, input_len, len);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> + } else if (uname) {
> + char zero = '\0';
> if (put_user(zero, uname))
> return -EFAULT;
> }

hm, why not just simple check buf for and keep the rest? seems less complicated..

jirka


---
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a8f1808a1ca5..e393b94b90ec 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3565,27 +3565,31 @@ static void bpf_perf_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
}

static int bpf_perf_link_fill_common(const struct perf_event *event,
- char __user *uname, u32 ulen,
+ char __user *uname, u32 *ulen,
u64 *probe_offset, u64 *probe_addr,
u32 *fd_type, unsigned long *missed)
{
const char *buf;
- u32 prog_id;
+ u32 prog_id, input_len;
size_t len;
int err;

- if (!ulen ^ !uname)
+ if (!(*ulen) ^ !uname)
return -EINVAL;

err = bpf_get_perf_event_info(event, &prog_id, fd_type, &buf,
probe_offset, probe_addr, missed);
if (err)
return err;
+ if (buf) {
+ input_len = *ulen;
+ len = strlen(buf);
+ *ulen = len + 1;
+ }
if (!uname)
return 0;
if (buf) {
- len = strlen(buf);
- err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, ulen, len);
+ err = bpf_copy_to_user(uname, buf, input_len, len);
if (err)
return err;
} else {