Re: [PATCH v5] rust: add PidNamespace

[Christian Brauner]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 02:01:36PM GMT, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 1:38 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The lifetime of `PidNamespace` is bound to `Task` and `struct pid`.
> >
> > The `PidNamespace` of a `Task` doesn't ever change once the `Task` is
> > alive. A `unshare(CLONE_NEWPID)` or `setns(fd_pidns/pidfd, CLONE_NEWPID)`
> > will not have an effect on the calling `Task`'s pid namespace. It will
> > only effect the pid namespace of children created by the calling `Task`.
> > This invariant guarantees that after having acquired a reference to a
> > `Task`'s pid namespace it will remain unchanged.
> >
> > When a task has exited and been reaped `release_task()` will be called.
> > This will set the `PidNamespace` of the task to `NULL`. So retrieving
> > the `PidNamespace` of a task that is dead will return `NULL`. Note, that
> > neither holding the RCU lock nor holding a referencing count to the
> > `Task` will prevent `release_task()` being called.
> >
> > In order to retrieve the `PidNamespace` of a `Task` the
> > `task_active_pid_ns()` function can be used. There are two cases to
> > consider:
> >
> > (1) retrieving the `PidNamespace` of the `current` task (2) retrieving
> > the `PidNamespace` of a non-`current` task
> >
> > From system call context retrieving the `PidNamespace` for case (1) is
> > always safe and requires neither RCU locking nor a reference count to be
> > held. Retrieving the `PidNamespace` after `release_task()` for current
> > will return `NULL` but no codepath like that is exposed to Rust.
> >
> > Retrieving the `PidNamespace` from system call context for (2) requires
> > RCU protection. Accessing `PidNamespace` outside of RCU protection
> > requires a reference count that must've been acquired while holding the
> > RCU lock. Note that accessing a non-`current` task means `NULL` can be
> > returned as the non-`current` task could have already passed through
> > `release_task()`.
> >
> > To retrieve (1) the `current_pid_ns!()` macro should be used which
> > ensure that the returned `PidNamespace` cannot outlive the calling
> > scope. The associated `current_pid_ns()` function should not be called
> > directly as it could be abused to created an unbounded lifetime for
> > `PidNamespace`. The `current_pid_ns!()` macro allows Rust to handle the
> > common case of accessing `current`'s `PidNamespace` without RCU
> > protection and without having to acquire a reference count.
> >
> > For (2) the `task_get_pid_ns()` method must be used. This will always
> > acquire a reference on `PidNamespace` and will return an `Option` to
> > force the caller to explicitly handle the case where `PidNamespace` is
> > `None`, something that tends to be forgotten when doing the equivalent
> > operation in `C`. Missing RCU primitives make it difficult to perform
> > operations that are otherwise safe without holding a reference count as
> > long as RCU protection is guaranteed. But it is not important currently.
> > But we do want it in the future.
> >
> > Note for (2) the required RCU protection around calling
> > `task_active_pid_ns()` synchronizes against putting the last reference
> > of the associated `struct pid` of `task->thread_pid`. The `struct pid`
> > stored in that field is used to retrieve the `PidNamespace` of the
> > caller. When `release_task()` is called `task->thread_pid` will be
> > `NULL`ed and `put_pid()` on said `struct pid` will be delayed in
> > `free_pid()` via `call_rcu()` allowing everyone with an RCU protected
> > access to the `struct pid` acquired from `task->thread_pid` to finish.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Overall looks good! A few comments below.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > +            task: unsafe { &*PidNamespace::from_ptr(pidns) },
> 
> I think you can simplify this to:
> task: unsafe { PidNamespace::from_ptr(pidns) },

Done.

> 
> > +    /// Returns the given task's pid in the provided pid namespace.
> > +    #[doc(alias = "task_tgid_nr_ns")]
> > +    pub fn tgid_nr_ns(&self, pidns: Option<&PidNamespace>) -> Pid {
> > +        match pidns {
> > +            // SAFETY: By the type invariant, we know that `self.0` is valid. We received a valid
> > +            // PidNamespace that we can use as a pointer.
> > +            Some(pidns) => unsafe { bindings::task_tgid_nr_ns(self.0.get(), pidns.as_ptr()) },
> > +            // SAFETY: By the type invariant, we know that `self.0` is valid. We received an empty
> > +            // PidNamespace and thus pass a null pointer. The underlying C function is safe to be
> > +            // used with NULL pointers.
> > +            None => unsafe { bindings::task_tgid_nr_ns(self.0.get(), ptr::null_mut()) },
> 
> The compiler generates better code if you do this:
> 
> let pidns = match pidns {
>     Some(pidns) => pidns.as_ptr(),
>     None => core::ptr::null_mut(),
> };
> unsafe { bindings::task_tgid_nr_ns(self.0.get(), pidns) };
> 
> Here it should be able to compile the entire match statement down to a
> no-op since None is represented as a null pointer.

Ah, great. Thanks and done!