Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq-helper: Various cleanups

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Mon Oct 07 2024 - 10:36:22 EST


Il 07/10/24 16:33, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:


On 03/10/2024 10:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 02/10/24 15:00, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:


On 02/10/2024 11:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:06:17 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
This series performs various cleanups to the MediaTek CMDQ Helper lib,
reducing code duplication and enhancing human readability.

This also avoids double initialization struct cmdq_instruction as,
in some cases, it was stack-initialized to zero and then overwritten
completely anyway a bit later.
I'd expect compilers to be somehow smart about that, but still, while
at it ... why not :-)

[...]

Applied to v6.12-next/soc, thanks!

[1/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move mask build and append to function
       https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/2400e830
[2/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Mark very unlikely branches as such
       https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/21ab3dae
[3/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move cmdq_instruction init to declaration
       https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/66705b89


You probably oversaw the sparse warning email on 3/3?

As I oversaw that you already merged this.


Yeah, I did. There's no problem anyway, as we can always replace the commits
without noise, I haven't pushed anything to -next :-)

I plan to do that (drop patch 2/3, delete `.mask = 0` on 3/3) soon, at max
next week anyway.


Perfect, before you do any locally please pull from remote as I did some changes, not sure if you saw my message on IRC.

Regarding -next: we don't need to keep commit history in linux-next neither, to even it got pushed to -next, we can drop patches in the queue with any problem.

My day was pretty full, I didn't. Thanks for shooting the email :-D


Have a nice afternoon :)

You too!
Angelo