Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/2] phy: usb: Broadcom BCM4908 USB init fixes

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon Oct 07 2024 - 14:17:37 EST


On 10/7/24 11:12, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 07-10-24, 10:06, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 10/7/24 08:48, Vinod Koul wrote:

On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:41:29 -0700, Sam Edwards wrote:
This is v2 of my previous patch [1] targeted at resolving a crash-on-boot on
the BCM4908 family due to a missized table.

Changes v1->v2:
- Florian requested this change be broken into an immediate bugfix (w/ the
'fixes' tag) and a second patch containing the coding change aimed at
preventing this problem from happening again

[...]

Applied, thanks!

[2/2] phy: usb: update Broadcom driver table to use designated initializers
commit: d3712b35f3c694cb932f87194caafc714109ea08

I looked at your tree and both patches are applied in the "next" branch and
the first one is also in the "fixes" branch, thanks Vinod!

First one should go into fixes, whereas second on next (due to
dependency merged fixes into next)

Yes that makes sense and is what I would have expected. I got worried about your git hook responding to this patch series and indicating that only the second patch had been applied, thus making me look into your tree to double check this had not been the case.
--
Florian