On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 12:33:47PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:Darn, that'll teach me for hurriedly going through the checkpatch warnings.
+REALTEK SPI-NANDPacham?
+M: Chris Pacham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The framework handles this being missing. This is just left over from the initial stub I created when I started. Will remove in v2.
+static int rtl_snand_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op *op)If the framework doesn't already support this callback being missing we
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
should probably make it so.
Otherwise this looks good.