Re: [PATCH v5.10] xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data

[Kuntal Nayak]

Thank you, Greg, for getting back to me. Following is the order for patches,

1. xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check
2. xfs: don't walk off the end of a directory data block
3. xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data


Hello xfs-team, could you kindly assist me in reviewing the 3 patches
listed above for LTS v5.10?

------
Sincerely,
Kuntal

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 1:00 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:39:56PM -0700, Kuntal Nayak wrote:
> > From: lei lu <llfamsec@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit fb63435b7c7dc112b1ae1baea5486e0a6e27b196 ]
>
> Also, what is the ordering here?  Should I just guess?