Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576

[Frank Wang]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 2024/9/30 3:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 02:10:24PM +0800, Frank Wang wrote:
> > From: Frank Wang <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add compatible for the USB2 phy in the Rockchip RK3576 SoC.
> >
> > This change also refactor the clocks list as there are new clocks
> > adding used for the USB MMU in RK3576 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v4:
> >   - refactor the clocks list used if:then:
> >
> > v3:
> >   - narrowed rk3576 clocks by compatible property.
> >
> > v2:
> >   - Categorize clock names by oneOf keyword.
> >
> > v1:
> >   - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/patch/20240923025326.10467-1-frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> >   .../bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml
> > index 5254413137c6..fc2c03d01a20 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
> >         - rockchip,rk3366-usb2phy
> >         - rockchip,rk3399-usb2phy
> >         - rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy
> > +      - rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
> >         - rockchip,rk3588-usb2phy
> >         - rockchip,rv1108-usb2phy
> >   
> > @@ -34,10 +35,12 @@ properties:
> >       const: 0
> >   
> >     clocks:
> > -    maxItems: 1
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 3
> >   
> >     clock-names:
> > -    const: phyclk
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 3
> >   
> >     assigned-clocks:
> >       description:
> > @@ -172,6 +175,45 @@ allOf:
> >               - interrupts
> >               - interrupt-names
> >   
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - rockchip,px30-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3128-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3228-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3308-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3328-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3366-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3399-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rk3588-usb2phy
> > +              - rockchip,rv1108-usb2phy
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          maxItems: 1
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          const: phyclk
> maxItems: 1 instead

Sorry for late reply.

Do you mean use "maxItems: 1" instead of "const: phyclk" ?


> > +
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          minItems: 3
> > +          maxItems: 3
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          items:
> > +            - const: phyclk
> > +            - const: aclk
> > +            - const: aclk_slv
> This list goes to the top property with minItems: 1. Here you have only
> minItems: 3.
>
> This way you have only one definition of entire list with same order of
> items between variants.

For rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy, three clocks are all required, and the 
driver does not care about the order of the clocks.

So is the above definition correct?


Best regards,
Frank

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof