Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver

[Pengfei Li]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 05:04:19PM -0700, Pengfei Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:07:05AM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 24-06-27 16:24:24, Pengfei Li wrote:
> > > 'IMX93_CLK_END' macro was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to
> > > indicate the number of clocks, but it is not part of the ABI, so
> > > it should be moved to clk driver.
> > > 
> > 
> > Right, why?
> > 
> > All other providers have been using the _CLK_END from the bindings
> > header. What is so special about this ? AFAICT, nothing.
> > 
> > > ---
> > > Change for v2:
> > > - Use pre-processor define to simplify code.
> > > - link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625175147.94985-1-pengfei.li_1@xxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > Pengfei Li (2):
> > >   clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver
> > >   dt-bindings: clock: imx93: Drop IMX93_CLK_END macro definition
> > > 
> > >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c             | 2 ++
> > >  include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h | 1 -
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> > 
> 
> Hi Abel,
> 
> This is a modification based on previous comments: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604150447.GA604729-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Actually, whether this _CLK_END macro change is added or not, both is ok for me.
> I just want to add some new clocks to bindings header.
> 
> BR,
> Pengfei Li
> 

Hi Abel, you are the maintainer of clk-imx93.c, so if this patchset is ok,
could you help apply it. and then I will send subsequent patchset to add some new clocks.

BR,
Pengfei Li