[PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment

[Peter Zijlstra]

Going through the RCU-boost and rtmutex code, I ran into this utterly
confusing comment. Fix it to avoid confusing future readers.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index a6974d044593..587ede8073c0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
+	 * This will deboost, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
 	 * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
 	 * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup.  preempt_disable()
 	 * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().