Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: implement bpf_send_signal_task() kfunc
From: Andrii Nakryiko
Date: Tue Oct 08 2024 - 14:20:04 EST
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 4:49 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Implement bpf_send_signal_task kfunc that is similar to
> bpf_send_signal_thread and bpf_send_signal helpers but can be used to
> send signals to other threads and processes. It also supports sending a
> cookie with the signal similar to sigqueue().
>
> If the receiving process establishes a handler for the signal using the
> SA_SIGINFO flag to sigaction(), then it can obtain this cookie via the
> si_value field of the siginfo_t structure passed as the second argument
> to the handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 1 +
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 4053f279ed4cc..2fd3feefb9d94 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -3035,6 +3035,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_get_cgroup1, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL)
> #endif
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_from_pid, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_throw)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_send_signal_task, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(generic_btf_ids)
>
> static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set generic_kfunc_set = {
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index a582cd25ca876..d9662e84510d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -802,6 +802,8 @@ struct send_signal_irq_work {
> struct task_struct *task;
> u32 sig;
> enum pid_type type;
> + bool has_siginfo;
> + struct kernel_siginfo info;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct send_signal_irq_work, send_signal_work);
> @@ -809,27 +811,46 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct send_signal_irq_work, send_signal_work);
> static void do_bpf_send_signal(struct irq_work *entry)
> {
> struct send_signal_irq_work *work;
> + struct kernel_siginfo *siginfo;
>
> work = container_of(entry, struct send_signal_irq_work, irq_work);
> - group_send_sig_info(work->sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, work->task, work->type);
> + siginfo = work->has_siginfo ? &work->info : SEND_SIG_PRIV;
> +
> + group_send_sig_info(work->sig, siginfo, work->task, work->type);
> put_task_struct(work->task);
> }
>
> -static int bpf_send_signal_common(u32 sig, enum pid_type type)
> +static int bpf_send_signal_common(u32 sig, enum pid_type type, struct task_struct *task, u64 value)
> {
> struct send_signal_irq_work *work = NULL;
> + struct kernel_siginfo info;
> + struct kernel_siginfo *siginfo;
> +
> + if (!task) {
> + task = current;
> + siginfo = SEND_SIG_PRIV;
> + } else {
> + clear_siginfo(&info);
> + info.si_signo = sig;
> + info.si_errno = 0;
> + info.si_code = SI_KERNEL;
> + info.si_pid = 0;
> + info.si_uid = 0;
> + info.si_value.sival_ptr = (void *)(unsigned long)value;
> + siginfo = &info;
> + }
>
> /* Similar to bpf_probe_write_user, task needs to be
> * in a sound condition and kernel memory access be
> * permitted in order to send signal to the current
> * task.
> */
> - if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_EXITING)))
> + if (unlikely(task->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_EXITING)))
> return -EPERM;
> if (unlikely(!nmi_uaccess_okay()))
> return -EPERM;
> /* Task should not be pid=1 to avoid kernel panic. */
> - if (unlikely(is_global_init(current)))
> + if (unlikely(is_global_init(task)))
> return -EPERM;
>
> if (irqs_disabled()) {
> @@ -847,19 +868,21 @@ static int bpf_send_signal_common(u32 sig, enum pid_type type)
> * to the irq_work. The current task may change when queued
> * irq works get executed.
> */
> - work->task = get_task_struct(current);
> + work->task = get_task_struct(task);
> + work->has_siginfo = siginfo == &info;
> + copy_siginfo(&work->info, &info);
we shouldn't copy_siginfo() if !work->has_siginfo, no?
other than that, lgtm
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> work->sig = sig;
> work->type = type;
> irq_work_queue(&work->irq_work);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - return group_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, current, type);
> + return group_send_sig_info(sig, siginfo, task, type);
> }
>
> BPF_CALL_1(bpf_send_signal, u32, sig)
> {
> - return bpf_send_signal_common(sig, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> + return bpf_send_signal_common(sig, PIDTYPE_TGID, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_proto = {
> @@ -871,7 +894,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_proto = {
>
> BPF_CALL_1(bpf_send_signal_thread, u32, sig)
> {
> - return bpf_send_signal_common(sig, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + return bpf_send_signal_common(sig, PIDTYPE_PID, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
> @@ -3484,3 +3507,16 @@ static int __init bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init(void)
> }
>
> late_initcall(bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init);
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_send_signal_task(struct task_struct *task, int sig, enum pid_type type,
> + u64 value)
> +{
> + if (type != PIDTYPE_PID && type != PIDTYPE_TGID)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return bpf_send_signal_common(sig, type, task, value);
> +}
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
> --
> 2.40.1
>