[PATCH v2 20/25] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use shadow_timekeeper

[Anna-Maria Behnsen]

From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.

Convert timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use this scheme.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index bb225534fee1..c1a2726a0d41 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1893,22 +1893,14 @@ bool timekeeping_rtc_skipsuspend(void)
  */
 void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(const struct timespec64 *delta)
 {
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tk_core.lock, flags);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
-
-	suspend_timing_needed = false;
-
-	timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
-
-	__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
-
-	timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_UPDATE_ALL | TK_MIRROR);
+	scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &tk_core.lock) {
+		struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
 
-	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
+		suspend_timing_needed = false;
+		timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
+		__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
+		timekeeping_update_staged(&tk_core, TK_UPDATE_ALL);
+	}
 
 	/* Signal hrtimers about time change */
 	clock_was_set(CLOCK_SET_WALL | CLOCK_SET_BOOT);

-- 
2.39.5