Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/482] 6.10.14-rc1 review

[Anders Roxell]

On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 08:22, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 17:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.14 release.
> > There are 482 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:55:15 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.14-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> The LTP syscalls fanotify22 test failed  (broken).
> This regression is noticed on linux.6.10.y, linux.6.11.y and linux.6.6.y.
>
> We are bisecting this issue.

The bisection pointed to patch b1a855f8a4fd ("ext4: don't set
SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors")
[ Upstream commit d3476f3dad4ad68ae5f6b008ea6591d1520da5d8 ]

Reverting patch b1a855f8a4fd ("ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after
filesystem errors") makes
ltp-syscalls/fanotify22 pass.

That said, I also checked Linus tree and fanotify22 fails there too.
Reverting the upstream
patch d3476f3dad4a ("ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem
errors") from Linux tree
v6.12-rc2-58-g75b607fab38d and run syscalls/fanotify22 it pass.

Any ideas whats wrong here?

Cheers,
Anders