Re: [PATCH] mfd: rtc: bd7xxxx Drop IC name from IRQ

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024, Matti Vaittinen wrote:

> A few ROHM PMICs have an RTC block which can be controlled by the
> rtc-bd70528 driver. The RTC driver needs the alarm interrupt information
> from the parent MFD driver. The MFD driver provides the interrupt
> information as a set of named interrupts, where the name is of form:
> <PMIC model>-rtc-alm-<x>, where x is an alarm block number.
> 
> From the RTC driver point of view it is irrelevant what the PMIC name
> is. It is sufficient to know this is alarm interrupt for a block X. The
> PMIC model information is carried to RTC via the platform device ID.
> Hence, having the PMIC model in the interrupt name is only making things
> more complex because the RTC driver needs to request differently named
> interrupts on different PMICs, making code unnecessary complicated.
> 
> Simplify this slightly by always using the RTC driver name 'bd70528' as
> the prefix for alarm interrupts, no matter what the exact PMIC model is,
> and always request the alarm interrupts of same name no matter what the
> PMIC model is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> This contains both the RTC and MFD changes in order to not break the
> functionality between commits to different subsystems.

I can take it with an RTC Ack and an indication whether an immutable
branch should be created and shared.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]