Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Buddy allocator like folio split
From: Zi Yan
Date: Wed Oct 09 2024 - 10:21:18 EST
On 9 Oct 2024, at 5:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 06:37:47PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 648 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 647 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> The idea is sane, but I think it would require a lot more ground work
> before getting it upstream. I don't think we can afford two parallel split
> implementations. folio_split() and split_huge_page*() should share the same
> implementation internally. Otherwise it is going to be pain to maintain
> them in-sync.
The goal is to replace split_huge_page*() with folio_split(). But for now,
split_huge_page*() is still needed for swap cached anon folios and shmem.
And this might take quite a while until we have a better swap system.
I think it is possible to use the same internal implementation
for both folio_split() and split_huge_page*(). I can give it a try in
the next version.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature