Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the mm tree

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/9/24 14:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:11:19 -0600 Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I fixed it up (I used the latter version of lib/math/Makefile and see
> > > below the signature by the patch immediately below) and can carry the
> > > fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> > > but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> > > maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> > > to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> > > minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay on this. Thank you for fixing this up.
> >
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Looks like we might see more conflicts between mm and kunit trees
> > with the move from lib/ lib/tests/
> >
> > I dropped a couple of patches I couldn't apply. Would you like
> > me to drop this from kunit tree?
>
> Yes please, it's mostly a lib/ thing.

Done.

Here is the link:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240924032200.167622-1-luis.hernandez093@xxxxxxxxx/
> I can't actually find the original patch email.  f099bda563dd doesn't
> have a Link: to the submission (please update your scripts to fix
> this)  and the patch wasn't cc'ed to anything to which I subscribe
> (please prefer to cc linux-kernel on most patches because of this).

Will do - thanks for the reminder.

thanks,
-- Shuah