RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Remove RZG2L_TINT_IRQ_START_INDEX

[Fabrizio Castro]

Hi Geert, hi Claudiu,

Thanks for your feedback!

> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 11:23 AM
> To: Claudiu.Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Geert
> Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Biju Das
> <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Remove RZG2L_TINT_IRQ_START_INDEX
> 
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:00 AM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 30.09.2024 17:52, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > > The RZ/V2H(P) has 16 IRQ interrupts, while every other platforms
> > > has 8, and this affects the start index of TINT interrupts
> > > (1 + 16 = 17, rather than 1 + 8 = 9).
> > > Macro RZG2L_TINT_IRQ_START_INDEX cannot work anymore, replace
> > > it with a new member within struct rzg2l_hwcfg.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> 
> > > @@ -251,6 +250,7 @@ enum rzg2l_iolh_index {
> > >   * @func_base: base number for port function (see register PFC)
> > >   * @oen_max_pin: the maximum pin number supporting output enable
> > >   * @oen_max_port: the maximum port number supporting output enable
> > > + * @tint_start_index: the start index for the TINT interrupts
> > >   */
> > >  struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
> > >       const struct rzg2l_register_offsets regs;
> > > @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
> > >       u8 func_base;
> > >       u8 oen_max_pin;
> > >       u8 oen_max_port;
> > > +     unsigned int tint_start_index;
> >
> > Maybe you can use u16 (even u8 is enough at the moment) and add it a bit
> > above (if u16 or even if unsigned int) to avoid any padding, if any.
> 
> Good catch, I had missed that struct rzg2l_register_offsets is 16-bit
> aligned ;-)
> 
> I will change it to u16 and move it up while applying.

Thank you both.

Kind regards,
Fab

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds