Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: use correct function name in pick_task_scx() warning message
From: Honglei Wang
Date: Wed Oct 09 2024 - 21:27:14 EST
On 2024/10/10 01:01, David Vernet wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:06:02AM +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>> pick_next_task_scx() was turned into pick_task_scx() since
>> commit 753e2836d139 ("sched_ext: Unify regular and core-sched pick
>> task paths"). Update the outdated message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Honglei Wang <jameshongleiwang@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/ext.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
>> index 410a4df8a121..22e18aec4ee1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
>> @@ -2958,7 +2958,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
>>
>> if (unlikely(!p->scx.slice)) {
>> if (!scx_rq_bypassing(rq) && !scx_warned_zero_slice) {
>> - printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "sched_ext: %s[%d] has zero slice in pick_next_task_scx()\n",
>> + printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "sched_ext: %s[%d] has zero slice in pick_task_scx()\n",
>
> Doesn't really matter much, but if we ever decide to touch this line again then
> something like this will be a bit more robust:
>
Indeed, I'll send a v2 patch later.
Thanks,
Honglei
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index fe8acae35166..9fde2d3f8df5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3020,8 +3020,8 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_task_scx(struct rq *rq)
>
> if (unlikely(!p->scx.slice)) {
> if (!scx_rq_bypassing(rq) && !scx_warned_zero_slice) {
> - printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "sched_ext: %s[%d] has zero slice in pick_next_task_scx()\n",
> - p->comm, p->pid);
> + printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "sched_ext: %s[%d] has zero slice in %s()\n",
> + p->comm, p->pid, __func__);
> scx_warned_zero_slice = true;
> }
> p->scx.slice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;