Re: [PATCH V22 00/22] Add support UHS-II for GL9755 and GL9767

[Victor Shih]

On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:34 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 12:28, Victor Shih <victorshihgli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Victor Shih <victor.shih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Summary
> > =======
> > These patches[1] support UHS-II and fix GL9755 and GL9767
> > UHS-II compatibility.
> >
> > About UHS-II, roughly deal with the following three parts:
> > 1) A UHS-II detection and initialization:
> > - Host setup to support UHS-II (Section 3.13.1 Host Controller Setup
> >   Sequence[2]).
> > - Detect a UHS-II I/F (Section 3.13.2 Card Interface Detection Sequence
> >   [2]).
> > - In step(9) of Section 3.13.2 in [2], UHS-II initialization is include
> >   Section 3.13.3 UHS-II Card Initialization and Section 3.13.4 UHS-II
> >   Setting Register Setup Sequence.
> >
> > 2) Send Legacy SD command through SD-TRAN
> > - Encapsulated SD packets are defined in SD-TRAN in order to ensure Legacy
> >   SD compatibility and preserve Legacy SD infrastructures (Section 7.1.1
> >   Packet Types and Format Overview[3]).
> > - Host issue a UHS-II CCMD packet or a UHS-II DCMD (Section 3.13.5 UHS-II
> >   CCMD Packet issuing and Section 3.13.6 UHS-II DCMD Packet issuing[2]).
> >
> > 3) UHS-II Interrupt
> > - Except for UHS-II error interrupts, most interrupts share the original
> >   interrupt registers.
> >
> > Patch structure
> > ===============
> > patch#1-#7:  for core
> > patch#8-#20: for sdhci
> > patch#21:    for GL9755
> > patch#22:    for GL9767
>
> Patch 1 -> 6 applied for next, with some minor updates to patch2.
>
> Patch 7 needs some more work, I will comment on that separately.
>
> I am okay with patch 8 -> 22, but since there will be a re-spin for a
> new version, perhaps you can run a new round of checkpatch.pl to see
> if some of the warning that it reports can be fixed too.
>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe

Hi, Ulf

I really appreciate your reply and I will resend the new series of
patches before the end of next week.
Do I need to include patch 1 to patch 6 when re-sending the new series
of patches?
Or should patch 7 to patch 22 be sufficient?

Thanks, Victor Shih