Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched.h: silent false ATOMIC_SLEEP warning from cond_resched

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 08:56:53AM +0530, Hariom Panthi wrote:
> In case of (CONFIG_PREEMPTION && !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC),
> cond_reched() is not sleeping.
> 
> Thus remove __might_resched in that cases.

*why* ? It's still a valid site to do the atomic_sleep testing, no?