Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route

From: Menglong Dong
Date: Thu Oct 10 2024 - 06:31:38 EST


On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:30 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/7/24 09:46, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > In this series, we mainly add some skb drop reasons to the input path of
> > ip routing.
> >
> > The errno from fib_validate_source() is -EINVAL or -EXDEV, and -EXDEV is
> > used in ip_rcv_finish_core() to increase the LINUX_MIB_IPRPFILTER. For
> > this case, we can check it by
> > "drop_reason == SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_RPFILTER" instead. Therefore, we can
> > make fib_validate_source() return -reason.
> >
> > Meanwhile, we make the following functions return drop reasons too:
> >
> > ip_route_input_mc()
> > ip_mc_validate_source()
> > ip_route_input_slow()
> > ip_route_input_rcu()
> > ip_route_input_noref()
> > ip_route_input()
>
> A few other functions are excluded, so that the ip input path coverage
> is not completed - i.e. ip_route_use_hint(), is that intentional?
>

Hello,

That's not intentional, I just missed them. At the beginning, I
wanted to organize the drop reasons in ip_route_input_noref(),
and things become complex when I do it. Let me have a check
and make the coverage complete.

> In any case does not apply cleanly anymore.
>
> Please answer to the above question and question on patch 1 before
> submitting a new revision. At very least the new revision should include
> a comment explaining the reasoning for the current choice.
>
> Please, include in each patch the detailed changelog after the '---'
> separator.
>

Sorry about that. I thought the patches for ip_route_input_noref,
ip_route_input_rcu, ip_route_input_slow are completely new one,
and abandoned the changelogs in the patches. I'll complete the
changelogs in the next version.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong


> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>