RE: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek: fixup ASUS GA605W

[Simon Trimmer]

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 13:15, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:53:49 +0200, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024, Luke D. Jones wrote:
> > > The GA605W laptop has almost the exact same codec setup as the GA403
> > > and so the same quirks apply to it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
> b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
> > > index 41e1119877b3..19b0bae074b6 100644
> > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
> > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c
> > > @@ -10507,7 +10507,7 @@ static const struct snd_pci_quirk
> > > alc269_fixup_tbl[] = {
> > ...
> > >  	SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x1e63, "ASUS H7606W",
> > ALC285_FIXUP_CS35L56_I2C_2),
> > > -	SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x1e83, "ASUS GA605W",
> > ALC285_FIXUP_CS35L56_I2C_2),
> > > +	SND_PCI_QUIRK(0x1043, 0x1e83, "ASUS GA605W",
> > ALC285_FIXUP_ASUS_GA403U_HEADSET_MIC),
> > ...
> >
> > Hi Luke,
> > Thanks!
> >
> > The support code for the CS35L56 has changed a little in Takashi's
branches
> > from what that patch was generated against and there is no longer an
> > existing quirk in the fixup table to trigger the component binding (but
the
> > general idea seems reasonable to hook the fixup of the headset mic).
> 
> Right, the patch doesn't apply to the latest tree for 6.12-rc.
> 
> We should start with setting up only the pincfg.  The binding with
> Cirrus is handled via find_cirrus_companion_amps().  The shared DAC
> of speaker and bass speaker is an open question, whether we still need
> the workaround by alc285_fixup_speaker2_to_dac1().  Let's see.
> 
> BTW, rather a question to Cirrus devs: may the call of
> find_cirrus_companion_amps() conflict with the existing manual setup
> of the Cirrus codec by a quirk entry?

I think we're good (I rarely get to access to the end products so try to
stick to the parts of the system that I have the details for which never
includes the Realtek codec...) in this general case I'd just expect that the
quirk entries wouldn't have the element at the end of the chain that used to
do the amp component binding fixup and the remaining tweaks for things like
the Realtek routing and mute indicators would be unaffected.

Cheers,
-Simon