Re: [PATCH 5/7] linux-kbuild: fix: implement choice for kconfigs

[David Hunter]

On 9/23/24 23:46, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> This is ugly.
> Please do not use the temp file.


Understood. I found a way to do it that is much more in line with the 
style of the script and it avoids using the temp file. Oddly enough it 
involves changing less lines of code as well. I will be submitting the 
changes soon. Right now, I am just finishing up the change logs for all 
the patches.

My question here is "Is there a general rule as to why the first version 
was bad?" For example, is it considered bad practice to make temporary 
files?

Thanks,
David Hunter