[PATCH 04/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't force flush if SPTE update clears Accessed bit

[Sean Christopherson]

Don't force a TLB flush if mmu_spte_update() clears the Accessed bit, as
access tracking tolerates false negatives, as evidenced by the
mmu_notifier hooks that explicitly test and age SPTEs without doing a TLB
flush.

In practice, this is very nearly a nop.  spte_write_protect() and
spte_clear_dirty() never clear the Accessed bit.  make_spte() always
sets the Accessed bit for !prefetch scenarios.  FNAME(sync_spte) only sets
SPTE if the protection bits are changing, i.e. if a flush will be needed
regardless of the Accessed bits.  And FNAME(pte_prefetch) sets SPTE if and
only if the old SPTE is !PRESENT.

That leaves kvm_arch_async_page_ready() as the one path that will generate
a !ACCESSED SPTE *and* overwrite a PRESENT SPTE.  And that's very arguably
a bug, as clobbering a valid SPTE in that case is nonsensical.

Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 30 +++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 176fc37540df..9ccfe7eba9b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -521,36 +521,24 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_update_no_track(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
  * not whether or not SPTEs were modified, i.e. only the write-tracking case
  * needs to flush at the time the SPTEs is modified, before dropping mmu_lock.
  *
+ * Remote TLBs also need to be flushed if the Dirty bit is cleared, as false
+ * negatives are not acceptable, e.g. if KVM is using D-bit based PML on VMX.
+ *
+ * Don't flush if the Accessed bit is cleared, as access tracking tolerates
+ * false negatives, and the one path that does care about TLB flushes,
+ * kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(), uses mmu_spte_update_no_track().
+ *
  * Returns true if the TLB needs to be flushed
  */
 static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
 {
-	bool flush = false;
 	u64 old_spte = mmu_spte_update_no_track(sptep, new_spte);
 
 	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * For the spte updated out of mmu-lock is safe, since
-	 * we always atomically update it, see the comments in
-	 * spte_has_volatile_bits().
-	 */
-	if (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_mmu_writable_spte(new_spte))
-		flush = true;
-
-	/*
-	 * Flush TLB when accessed/dirty states are changed in the page tables,
-	 * to guarantee consistency between TLB and page tables.
-	 */
-
-	if (is_accessed_spte(old_spte) && !is_accessed_spte(new_spte))
-		flush = true;
-
-	if (is_dirty_spte(old_spte) && !is_dirty_spte(new_spte))
-		flush = true;
-
-	return flush;
+	return (is_mmu_writable_spte(old_spte) && !is_mmu_writable_spte(new_spte)) ||
+	       (is_dirty_spte(old_spte) && !is_dirty_spte(new_spte));
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog