Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: ip: make fib_validate_source() return drop reason

From: Menglong Dong
Date: Fri Oct 11 2024 - 02:42:24 EST


On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:18 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 4:25 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/7/24 09:46, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > > In this commit, we make fib_validate_source/__fib_validate_source return
> > > -reason instead of errno on error. As the return value of them can be
> > > -errno, 0, and 1, we can't make it return enum skb_drop_reason directly.
> > >
> > > In the origin logic, if __fib_validate_source() return -EXDEV,
> > > LINUX_MIB_IPRPFILTER will be counted. And now, we need to adjust it by
> > > checking "reason == SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_RPFILTER". However, this will take
> > > effect only after the patch "net: ip: make ip_route_input_noref() return
> > > drop reasons", as we can't pass the drop reasons from
> > > fib_validate_source() to ip_rcv_finish_core() in this patch.
> > >
> > > We set the errno to -EINVAL when fib_validate_source() is called and the
> > > validation fails, as the errno can be checked in the caller and now its
> > > value is -reason, which can lead misunderstand.
> > >
> > > Following new drop reasons are added in this patch:
> > >
> > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCAL_SOURCE
> > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_SOURCE
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Looking at the next patches, I'm under the impression that the overall
> > code will be simpler if you let __fib_validate_source() return directly
> > a drop reason, and fib_validate_source(), too. Hard to be sure without
> > actually do the attempt... did you try such patch by any chance?
> >
>
> I analysed the usages of fib_validate_source() before. The
> return value of fib_validate_source() can be -errno, "0", and "1".
> And the value "1" can be used by the caller, such as
> __mkroute_input(). Making it return drop reasons can't cover this
> case.
>
> It seems that __mkroute_input() is the only case that uses the
> positive returning value of fib_validate_source(). Let me think
> about it more in this case.

Hello,

After digging into the code of __fib_validate_source() and __mkroute_input(),
I think it's hard to make __fib_validate_source() return drop reasons
directly.

The __fib_validate_source() will return 1 if the scope of the
source(revert) route is HOST. And the __mkroute_input()
will mark the skb with IPSKB_DOREDIRECT in this
case (combine with some other conditions). And then, a REDIRECT
ICMP will be sent in ip_forward() if this flag exists.

I don't find a way to pass this information to __mkroute_input
if we make __fib_validate_source() return drop reasons. Can we?

An option is to add a wrapper for fib_validate_source(), such as
fib_validate_source_reason(), which returns drop reasons. And in
__mkroute_input(), we still call fib_validate_source().

What do you think?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Paolo
> >