Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] x86/module: perpare module loading for ROX allocations of text

[Mike Rapoport]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 03:54:11PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 09:08:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > When module text memory will be allocated with ROX permissions, the
> > memory at the actual address where the module will live will contain
> > invalid instructions and there will be a writable copy that contains the
> > actual module code.
> > 
> > Update relocations and alternatives patching to deal with it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I bisected a boot failure that I see with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG enabled to
> this change as commit be712757cabd ("x86/module: perpare module loading
> for ROX allocations of text") in -next.
 
>   [    0.000000] Linux version 6.12.0-rc2-00140-gbe712757cabd (nathan@n3-xlarge-x86) (ClangBuiltLinux clang version 19.1.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git a4bf6cd7cfb1a1421ba92bca9d017b49936c55e4), ClangBuiltLinux LLD 19.1.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git a4bf6cd7cfb1a1421ba92bca9d017b49936c55e4)) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Oct 10 22:42:57 UTC 2024
>   ...
>   [    0.092204] Speculative Store Bypass: Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
>   [    0.093207] TAA: Mitigation: TSX disabled
>   [    0.093711] MMIO Stale Data: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers
>   [    0.094228] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x001: 'x87 floating point registers'
>   [    0.095203] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x002: 'SSE registers'
>   [    0.096203] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x004: 'AVX registers'
>   [    0.097203] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x020: 'AVX-512 opmask'
>   [    0.098003] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x040: 'AVX-512 Hi256'
>   [    0.098203] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x080: 'AVX-512 ZMM_Hi256'
>   [    0.099203] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x200: 'Protection Keys User registers'
>   [    0.100204] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[2]:  576, xstate_sizes[2]:  256
>   [    0.101204] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[5]:  832, xstate_sizes[5]:   64
>   [    0.102203] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[6]:  896, xstate_sizes[6]:  512
>   [    0.103204] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[7]: 1408, xstate_sizes[7]: 1024
>   [    0.104051] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[9]: 2432, xstate_sizes[9]:    8
>   [    0.104204] x86/fpu: Enabled xstate features 0x2e7, context size is 2440 bytes, using 'compacted' format.
> 
> then nothing after that. Boot is successful if CFI is not enabled (the
> initrd will just shutdown the machine after printing the version string).
> 
> If there is any further information I can provide or patches I can test,
> I am more than happy to do so.

I overlooked how cfi_*_callers routines update addr.
This patch should fix it:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 3b3fa93af3b1..cf782f431110 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -1148,11 +1148,13 @@ static int cfi_disable_callers(s32 *start, s32 *end, struct module *mod)
 
 	for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
 		void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
-		void *wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		void *wr_addr;
 		u32 hash;
 
 		addr -= fineibt_caller_size;
-		hash = decode_caller_hash(addr);
+		wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		hash = decode_caller_hash(wr_addr);
+
 		if (!hash) /* nocfi callers */
 			continue;
 
@@ -1172,11 +1174,12 @@ static int cfi_enable_callers(s32 *start, s32 *end, struct module *mod)
 
 	for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
 		void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
-		void *wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		void *wr_addr;
 		u32 hash;
 
 		addr -= fineibt_caller_size;
-		hash = decode_caller_hash(addr);
+		wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		hash = decode_caller_hash(wr_addr);
 		if (!hash) /* nocfi callers */
 			continue;
 
@@ -1249,11 +1252,12 @@ static int cfi_rand_callers(s32 *start, s32 *end, struct module *mod)
 
 	for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
 		void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
-		void *wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		void *wr_addr;
 		u32 hash;
 
 		addr -= fineibt_caller_size;
-		hash = decode_caller_hash(addr);
+		wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		hash = decode_caller_hash(wr_addr);
 		if (hash) {
 			hash = -cfi_rehash(hash);
 			text_poke_early(wr_addr + 2, &hash, 4);
@@ -1269,14 +1273,15 @@ static int cfi_rewrite_callers(s32 *start, s32 *end, struct module *mod)
 
 	for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
 		void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
-		void *wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		void *wr_addr;
 		u32 hash;
 
 		addr -= fineibt_caller_size;
-		hash = decode_caller_hash(addr);
+		wr_addr = module_writable_address(mod, addr);
+		hash = decode_caller_hash(wr_addr);
 		if (hash) {
 			text_poke_early(wr_addr, fineibt_caller_start, fineibt_caller_size);
-			WARN_ON(*(u32 *)(addr + fineibt_caller_hash) != 0x12345678);
+			WARN_ON(*(u32 *)(wr_addr + fineibt_caller_hash) != 0x12345678);
 			text_poke_early(wr_addr + fineibt_caller_hash, &hash, 4);
 		}
 		/* rely on apply_retpolines() */
 
> Cheers,
> Nathan

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.