Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_hist_cpu->*_count unsigned long long
From: John Kacur
Date: Fri Oct 11 2024 - 11:10:40 EST
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Do the same fix as in previous commit also for timerlat-hist.
>
> Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afazekas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
> index a3907c390d67..bbeaba8b5183 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
> +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
> @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ struct timerlat_hist_cpu {
> int *thread;
> int *user;
>
> - int irq_count;
> - int thread_count;
> - int user_count;
> + unsigned long long irq_count;
> + unsigned long long thread_count;
> + unsigned long long user_count;
>
> unsigned long long min_irq;
> unsigned long long sum_irq;
> @@ -304,15 +304,15 @@ timerlat_print_summary(struct timerlat_hist_params *params,
> continue;
>
> if (!params->no_irq)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> data->hist[cpu].irq_count);
>
> if (!params->no_thread)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> data->hist[cpu].thread_count);
>
> if (params->user_hist)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> data->hist[cpu].user_count);
> }
> trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
> @@ -488,15 +488,15 @@ timerlat_print_stats_all(struct timerlat_hist_params *params,
> trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "count:");
>
> if (!params->no_irq)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> sum.irq_count);
>
> if (!params->no_thread)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> sum.thread_count);
>
> if (params->user_hist)
> - trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
> + trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
> sum.user_count);
>
> trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
> --
> 2.47.0
>
>
>
Reviewed by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>