Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Fix uninitialized variable

[Javier Carrasco]

...

> 
> Hi everyone!
> 
> So if you check also the conversations that we had here [1] and in the
> previous versions, indeed the idea behind the offset is to use it as an
> self-explanatory index to a char buffer that holds in fact s32 variables.
> 
> The data->buf here holds the values that have just been read from the
> sensor. If you check on the channel specification of this sensor,
> you will see ".realbits = 24" in both values that the sensor returns so
> hence the value 3.
> 

So you are using 3 = 24 bits, but s32 not as 4 bytes? the whole thing
would have turned into sensor_data[0], sensor_data[4], and no variables
implied, correct? But I am discussing too much for something that in the
end is more or less the same, I am fine with this proposal.

> I am not sure if it makes sense to use a macro here for each one of the
> 3's that are going to be used only one time each and in order to be more
> "consistent". But I might have a wrong view on this one so feel free to
> correct me!
> 
> For the initialization of the offset indeed, it was already mentioned
> here [2] this morning, but on a different patch!!! I couldn't get this
> error though with gcc...
> 
> Cheers,
> Vasilis
> 

At least for the things I do in the kernel, clang catches more issues
than gcc. Sometimes even gcc will not complain, and clang will fail to
compile (e.g. a goto before a cleanup attribute).

And if you run smatch before sending the series, you might discover a
couple of extra "surprises".

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco