Re: [PATCH] tracing: replace multiple deprecated strncpy with strscpy

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:59:16 -0700
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So, assuming I haven't lost your faith, I can send a v2 along the lines of:

Not yet ;-)

> 
> 1)
>   strscpy(num_buf, str + s, len + 1);
> 
>   ... or
> 2)
>   memcpy(num_buf, str + s, len);
>   num_buf[len] = 0;
> 
> And if you're wondering about option 3: "Don't change anything because
> the code works". I'd reiterate that I think it's important to replace
> bad ambiguous APIs. There are many cases where folks use strncpy() as
> a glorified memcpy because they want the padding behavior, or they use
> it on non-null terminated destinations or tons of other "misuses".
> Ambiguous code like that poses a real danger to the maintainability of
> the codebase and opens threat vectors.

I use it as a string memcpy, where it doesn't copy more than source. But I
don't care about the padding. So option 2 is fine with me.

-- Steve