Re: [PATCH rcu 03/12] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor

From: Neeraj Upadhyay
Date: Mon Oct 14 2024 - 05:19:04 EST

Next message: Dikshita Agarwal: "[PATCH v4 04/28] media: iris: introduce iris core state management with shared queues"
Previous message: Dikshita Agarwal: "[PATCH v4 28/28] media: MAINTAINERS: add Qualcomm iris video accelerator driver"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "[PATCH rcu 03/12] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH rcu 03/12] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/9/2024 11:37 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Currently, there are only two flavors of readers, normal and NMI-safe.
> A number of fields, functions, and types reflect this restriction.
> This renaming-only commit prepares for the addition of light-weight
> (as in memory-barrier-free) readers. OK, OK, there is also a drive-by
> white-space fixeup!
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/srcu.h | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/srcutree.h | 2 +-
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index 835bbb2d1f88a..06728ef6f32a4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -181,10 +181,9 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> #define SRCU_NMI_SAFE 0x2
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_TREE_SRCU)
> -void srcu_check_nmi_safety(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool nmi_safe);
> +void srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor);
> #else
> -static inline void srcu_check_nmi_safety(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
> - bool nmi_safe) { }
> +static inline void srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor) { }
> #endif
>
>
> @@ -245,7 +244,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
> {
> int retval;
>
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);

As srcu_check_read_flavor() takes an "int" now, passing a macro for the type of reader would
be better here?

> retval = __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
> srcu_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
> return retval;
> @@ -262,7 +261,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp
> {
> int retval;
>
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, true);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, true);
> retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp);
> rcu_try_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map);
> return retval;
> @@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
> {
> int retval;
>
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);
> retval = __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
> return retval;
> }
> @@ -303,7 +302,7 @@ srcu_read_lock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
> static inline int srcu_down_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
> {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);
> return __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
> }
>
> @@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
> __releases(ssp)
> {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);
> srcu_lock_release(&ssp->dep_map);
> __srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
> }
> @@ -334,7 +333,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
> __releases(ssp)
> {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, true);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, true);
> rcu_lock_release(&ssp->dep_map);
> __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx);
> }
> @@ -343,7 +342,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
> static inline notrace void
> srcu_read_unlock_notrace(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp)
> {
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);
> __srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
> }
>
> @@ -360,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void srcu_up_read(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
> {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
> - srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
> + srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, false);
> __srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> index ed57598394de3..ab7d8d215b84b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct srcu_data {
> /* Read-side state. */
> atomic_long_t srcu_lock_count[2]; /* Locks per CPU. */
> atomic_long_t srcu_unlock_count[2]; /* Unlocks per CPU. */
> - int srcu_nmi_safety; /* NMI-safe srcu_struct structure? */
> + int srcu_reader_flavor; /* Reader flavor for srcu_struct structure? */

This is a mask for the reader flavor, so s/srcu_reader_flavor/srcu_reader_flavor_mask ?

- Neeraj

>
> /* Update-side state. */
> spinlock_t __private lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index e29c6cbffbcb0..18f2eae5e14bd 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_readers_unlock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
>
> sum += atomic_long_read(&cpuc->srcu_unlock_count[idx]);
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
> - mask = mask | READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_nmi_safety);
> + mask = mask | READ_ONCE(cpuc->srcu_reader_flavor);
> }
> WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && (mask & (mask >> 1)),
> "Mixed NMI-safe readers for srcu_struct at %ps.\n", ssp);
> @@ -699,25 +699,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cleanup_srcu_struct);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
> /*
> - * Check for consistent NMI safety.
> + * Check for consistent reader flavor.
> */
> -void srcu_check_nmi_safety(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool nmi_safe)
> +void srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor)
> {
> - int nmi_safe_mask = 1 << nmi_safe;
> - int old_nmi_safe_mask;
> + int reader_flavor_mask = 1 << read_flavor;
> + int old_reader_flavor_mask;
> struct srcu_data *sdp;
>
> /* NMI-unsafe use in NMI is a bad sign */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!nmi_safe && in_nmi());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!read_flavor && in_nmi());
> sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
> - old_nmi_safe_mask = READ_ONCE(sdp->srcu_nmi_safety);
> - if (!old_nmi_safe_mask) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(sdp->srcu_nmi_safety, nmi_safe_mask);
> + old_reader_flavor_mask = READ_ONCE(sdp->srcu_reader_flavor);
> + if (!old_reader_flavor_mask) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(sdp->srcu_reader_flavor, reader_flavor_mask);
> return;
> }
> - WARN_ONCE(old_nmi_safe_mask != nmi_safe_mask, "CPU %d old state %d new state %d\n", sdp->cpu, old_nmi_safe_mask, nmi_safe_mask);
> + WARN_ONCE(old_reader_flavor_mask != reader_flavor_mask, "CPU %d old state %d new state %d\n", sdp->cpu, old_reader_flavor_mask, reader_flavor_mask);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_check_nmi_safety);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_check_read_flavor);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
>
> /*

Next message: Dikshita Agarwal: "[PATCH v4 04/28] media: iris: introduce iris core state management with shared queues"
Previous message: Dikshita Agarwal: "[PATCH v4 28/28] media: MAINTAINERS: add Qualcomm iris video accelerator driver"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "[PATCH rcu 03/12] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH rcu 03/12] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]