Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/connector: hdmi: Fix memory leak in drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic()

From: Jinjie Ruan
Date: Mon Oct 14 2024 - 05:21:37 EST




On 2024/10/14 17:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:16:30PM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> modprobe drm_connector_test and then rmmod drm_connector_test,
>> the following memory leak occurs.
>>
>> The `mode` allocated in drm_mode_duplicate() called by
>> drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic() is not freed, which cause the memory leak:
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xffffff80cb0ee400 (size 128):
>> comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1948, jiffies 4294950339
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 14 44 02 00 80 07 d8 07 04 08 98 08 00 00 38 04 .D............8.
>> 3c 04 41 04 65 04 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <.A.e...........
>> backtrace (crc 90e9585c):
>> [<00000000ec42e3d7>] kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0x40
>> [<00000000d0ef055a>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x26c/0x2f4
>> [<00000000c2062161>] drm_mode_duplicate+0x44/0x19c
>> [<00000000f96c74aa>] drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic+0x88/0x98
>> [<00000000d8f2c8b4>] 0xffffffdc982a4868
>> [<000000005d164dbc>] kunit_try_run_case+0x13c/0x3ac
>> [<000000006fb23398>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x80/0xec
>> [<000000006ea56ca0>] kthread+0x2e8/0x374
>> [<000000000676063f>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> ......
>>
>> Free `mode` by calling drm_mode_destroy() to fix it.
>>
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Fixes: abb6f74973e2 ("drm/tests: Add HDMI TDMS character rate tests")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
>> index 15e36a8db685..9c94d26b3486 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
>> @@ -1004,6 +1004,8 @@ static void drm_test_drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock_rgb(struct kunit *test)
>> rate = drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock(mode, 8, HDMI_COLORSPACE_RGB);
>> KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mode->clock * 1000ULL, rate);
>> +
>> + drm_mode_destroy(drm, mode);
>> }
>
> If KUNIT_ASSERT_GT triggers, then we would end up leaking the mode as well.
>
> I think we should create a kunit_drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic()
> function that registers a kunit action to free the mode when the test is
> done.

You are right! That will be nice and could be used by the new KUNIT test
modules.

>
> Maxime