Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/panic: allow verbose boolean for clarity

[Jocelyn Falempe]

On 14/10/2024 18:59, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:54 AM Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > With the suggestions from Alice Ryhl to not introduce a return, and use
> > expect:
>
> +1 to both.
>
> `expect` (here and the other ones I suggested) require `rust-next`, so
> if this goes through DRM, then we can clean this up later. Otherwise,
> if you prefer `rust-next`, we can change them to `expect` already.

I don't plan to touch drm_panic_qr.rs, so I think it's better if this 
series goes through rust-next, to avoid an extra cleanup step later.

--

Jocelyn

> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel