Re: [PATCH 6/7] osnoise: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPTION=y

[Ankur Arora]

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2024-10-10 10:50:29 [-0700], Ankur Arora wrote:
>> > PREEMPTION=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n should not be possible.
>>
>> That's a statement. Is there an argument here?
>
> For my taste you should describe in your cover letter the actual problem
> and what you intend to do about it.

Yes, that's a good point. It has been discussed a few times before but
I clearly didn't make a case for it here.

Thanks
Ankur