Re: [PATCH 6.11 000/214] 6.11.4-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:46:45AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 15. 10. 24, 9:18, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 15. 10. 24, 9:05, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 19:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > Reverting of this makes it work again:
> > > commit 51ab63c4cc8fbcfee58b8342a35006b45afbbd0d
> > > Refs: v6.11.3-19-g51ab63c4cc8f
> > > Author:     Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 4 11:39:27 2024 +0200
> > > Commit:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > CommitDate: Mon Oct 14 16:10:09 2024 +0200
> > > 
> > >      s390/boot: Compile all files with the same march flag
> > > 
> > >      [ Upstream commit fccb175bc89a0d37e3ff513bb6bf1f73b3a48950 ]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If the above is to be really used in stable (REASONS?), I believe at
> > > least these are missing:
> > > ebcc369f1891 s390: Use MARCH_HAS_*_FEATURES defines
> > > 697b37371f4a s390: Provide MARCH_HAS_*_FEATURES defines
> > 
> > And this one:
> > db545f538747 s390/boot: Increase minimum architecture to z10
> 
> All of this is not supposed to be stable material.
> 

Agreed, I'm dropping this compile s390 patch, thanks for the build
testing everyone!  Something went wrong with the testing on our end,
odd...

thanks,

greg k-h